Showing posts with label segmental testicular infarct. Show all posts
Showing posts with label segmental testicular infarct. Show all posts

Saturday, October 18, 2014

SEGMENTAL TESTICULAR INFARCT

Image Presentation

ACUTE SEGMENTAL TESTICULAR INFARCT -  mimic like a tumor on grayscale ultrasound , and color Doppler ultrasound  can clearly differentiate it from tumor .


Abstract
Segmental testicular infract is very uncommon pathology , & involves variable etiology , but commonly idiopathic . On grayscale ultrasound it appears as a focal inhomogenic mass which is difficult to be differentiated  from testicular tumor . However high resolution color Doppler ultrasound confidently diagnose it as an area of infarction & allows testis sparing surgery .

Introduction
Color Doppler ultrasound ( CDUS ) is very useful modality in evaluation of acute scrotum , and to  differentiate  between epididymoorchitis & torsion when symptoms may overlap  ( 2 ) .  The common conditions causing a painful scrotum  includes torsion & epididymoorchitis ,  and rarely tumor . Testicular tumor normally presents as a slow growing mass , rarely painful , and incidently discorved by the patient( 3 ) . On grayscale ultrasound tumor appears as an inhomogenic focal mass and CDUS demonstrates internal vascularity with malignant vascular pattern ( 4 ) . I present a case with painful testicular focal inhomogenic mass on grayscale ultrasound where CDUS allowed the diagnosis of segmental testicular infarction , rather than a testicular tumor , to be labelled .

Case report
A 46 years old man presented with a history of increasing right testicular pain for few days . The case was already  on antibiotics for presumed epididymoorchitis , however with no significant relief . On physical examination there was tenderness at the upper pole of right testis and epididymis , and a clinical diagnosis of epididymoorchitis was made.  In view of no relief in symptoms , the scrotal sonography was requested . Scrotal sonography was performed on GE – Logiq 400 pro  ultrasound system , using 8 to 11 MHZ. linear probe with small parts setting . The grayscale ultrasound examination revealed a focal enlarged inhomogenic area of  iso to hypoechoic echogenisity  at upper pole of right testis ( figure 1 ) . The CDUS failed to show any color flow signals within the mass but color flow signals were noted normal in rest of the testicular parenchyma ( figure 2 ) .  No any calcific focus or cystic change noted within lesion . No any other ultrasound evidence of epididymoorchitis was present . The possibility of an acute segmental testicular infract was made rather then a tumor because of absent color doppler signals in the focal abnormal area . The patient had normal complete blood count , and  was advised surgical exporation  by the referring doctor to exclude spermatic cord torsion as a cause for the abnormality . But  the patient  had refused for surgery , and  was  allowed to continue symptomatic medical treatment for some days .
After few weeks the referring doctor was contacted for follow up details of this case , and he ( referring doctor )  confirmed that the patient improved gradually and became symptom free with some residual testicular atrophy . The patient  was advised a review ultrasound  but he did not turn up .  
            
Discussion
Total testicular infarction is usually seen after torsion of spermatic cord , severe epididymoorchitis or trauma ( 2 ) . Segmental testicular infarction  is a rare entity and usually diagnosed by postorchidectomy histopathology  ( 5, 6 ) . The predisposing factors to segmental infarction  includes polycythemia ( 7 ) , intimal fibroplasia of spermatic artery ( 8 ) , sickle cell disease ( 9 ) , hypersensitivity angitits ( 10 ) and trauma , although most of the cases are idiopathic in origin ( 7 ) , as in this case . S. Sriprasad  et. al. reported a case  in BJR in 2001  with the same grayscale and CDUS  findings , which was proved to be a segmental testicular infarct histopathologically .  Scrotal sonography is valuable tool in differential diagnosis  of acute scrotum , & clearly differentiate  testicular torsion & infarct with high accuracy . In epididymoorchitis the testis and epididymis shows hyperemia , whereas absent or poor vascularity seen in torsion and infarct . The B- mode findings in acute testicular ischemia are enlarged and hypoechoic testis . CDUS helps to diagnose testicular torsion  where absent or poor blood flow noted in symptomatic testis  , and normal blood flow in contralateral  testis . The testicular tumors are usually seen as focal inhomogenic  or variable echotexture  masses with disordered / malignant internal vascularity on Doppler  ( 13 ) . On color Doppler , focal lesions larger than 16 mm , usually show raised and disordered blood flow ( 4 ) . Segmental testicular infarct also appears as focal mass of variable echogenicity with absent blood flow on Doppler ( 1 ) .  However cases with focal area of increased echogenicity  and poor or absent blood flow on CDUS were also reported and documented  in  segmental infarct ( 16 ) . This case showed  focal inhomogenic or variable echotexture mass at upper pole right testis with absent blood flow signals on CDUS , closely resembles the case reported by S. Sriprasad  et. al. . There was  focal enlargement of upper pole of testis , which may indicate acute nature of  the disease , because in chronic process the affected testis may appear small or shrunken ( 16 ) .  So with recent advances in probe technology and color Doppler sensitivity , it is  possible to document Intratesticular blood flow as well as vasculature pattern in a better way , which is  important particularly in differentiating a malignant mass from segmental infarction , as both appears identical on B – mode ultrasound , and thereby helpful in  suggesting a treatment  planning ( testis sparing & conservative management ) .



  
                   ( Figure 1 )    - Sagittal US image shows inhomogenic iso to hypoechoic mass like lesion 
                                         ( two small arrows ) involving upper pole of right testis    






   
               ( Figure 2 )  -  Color Doppler Us image of same testis shows absent color flow signals in the                                    abnormal area     s/o infarct , and normal blood flow signals in rest of the testis .

 PS ; The case study is based on imaging features & review literature , and intended for medical professionals & imaging specialists for academic purpose .



Referrences
1.      S .sriprasad  et al. Acute segmental testicular infarct : differentiation from tumour using high frequency colour Doppler ultrasound. BJR [74]2001,965-967
2.      Sidhu PS. Clinical and imaging features of testicular torsion: role of ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1999;54:343–52.[Medline]
3.      Morse MJ, Whitmore WF. Neoplasms of the testis. In: Walsh PC, Stamey TA, editors. Campbell's Urology (5th edn). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co., 1986:1535–82.
4.      Horstman WG, Melson GL, Middleton WD, Andriole GL. Testicular tumours: findings with color Doppler US. Radiology 1992;185:733–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5.      Han DP, Dmochowski RR, Blasser MH, Auman JR. Segmental infarction of the testicle: atypical presentation of a testicular mass. J Urol 1994;151:159–60.[Medline]
6.      Costa M, Calleja R, Ball RY, Burgess N. Segmental testicular infarction. BJU Int 1999;83:525.[Medline]
7.      Jordan GH. Segmental hemorrhagic infarct of testicle. Urology 1987;29:60–3.[Medline]
8.      Brehmer-Andersson E, Andersson L, Johansson J. Hemorrhagic infarctions of testis due to intimal fibroplasia of spermatic artery. Urology 1985;25:379–82.[Medline]
9.      Holmes NM, Kane CJ. Testicular infarction associated with sickle cell disease. J Urol 1998;160:130.[Medline]
10.    Baer HM, Gerber WL, Kendall AR, Locke JL, Putong PB. Segmental infarct of the testis due to hypersensitivity angiitis. J Urol 1989;142:125–7.[Medline]
11.    Martin B, Conte J. Ultrasonography of the acute scrotum. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15:37–44.[Medline]
12.    Middleton WD, Melson GL. Testicular ischemia: color Doppler sonographic findings in five patients. AJR 1989;152:1237–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13.    Grantham JG, Charboneau JW, James EM, et al. Testicular neoplasms: 29 tumors studied by high-resolution US. Radiology 1985;157:775–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14.    Gofrit ON, Rund D, Shapiro A, Pappo O, Landau EH, Pode D. Segmental testicular infarction due to sickle cell disease. J Ultrasound Med 1998;160:835–6.
15.    Flanagan JJ, Fowler RC. Testicular infarction mimicking tumour on scrotal ultrasound: a potential pitfall. Clin Radiol 1995;50:49–50.[Medline]
16.    Kramolowsky EV, Beauchamp RA, Milby WP. Color Doppler ultrasound for the diagnosis of segmental testicular infarction. J Urol 1993;150:972–3.[Medline]

17.    Bushby L, Sriprasad SI, Sidhu PS. Focal testicular abnormalities: evaluation of lesion vascularity using high frequency colour Doppler ultrasound. Eur J Ultrasound 2001;13:S30.